Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications
2013
Session Number:B2L-A
Session:
Number:236
A surrogate for networks—How scale-free is my scale-free network?
Michael Small, Kevin Judd, Thomas Stemler,
pp.236-239
Publication Date:
Online ISSN:2188-5079
[1] A. Barabá si and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286:509-512, 1999.
[2] D. S. Bassett, M. A. Porter, N. F. Wymba, S. T. Grafton, J. M. Carlson, and P. J. Mucha. Robust detection of dynamic community structure in networks. Chaos, 23(1):013142, 2013.
[3] K. Judd, M. Small, and T. Stemler. What exactly are the properties of scale-free networks? arXiv, 1305.7296, 2013. Under review.
[4] M. Newman. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2010.
[5] T. Schreiber and A. Schmitz. Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physical Review Letters, 77:635-638, 1996.
[6] M. Small, K. Judd, and T. Stemler. What is preferential to preferential attachment? arXiv, 1305.6429, 2013. In preparation.
[7] M. Small and C. Tse. Detecting determinism in time series: The method of surrogate data. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, 50:663-672, 2003.
[8] M. Small, D. M. Walker, A. Tordesillas, and C. K. Tse. Characterising chaotic dynamics from simulations of large strain behaviour of a granular material under biaxial compression. In International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications, 2012.
[9] M. Small, D. M. Walker, A. Tordesillas, and C. K. Tse. Characterising chaotic dynamics from simulations of large strain behaviour of a granular material under biaxial compression. Chaos, 2013. In press.
[10] J. Theiler, S. Eubank, A. Longtin, B. Galdrikian, and J. D. Farmer. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58:77-94, 1992.