Presentation | 2014-10-07 A Confusion on Correct Interpretation of RFC821 (SMTP) about Domain Names Masataka OHTA, |
---|---|
PDF Download Page | PDF download Page Link |
Abstract(in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Abstract(in English) | While RFC821 does not allow using CNAME for mail domains, which is, seemingly, unnecessary and unreasonable restriction resulting in confusions on mail protocol specifications. By studying historical background at that time, it is found that specification of RFC 1123, which should clarify RFC821, do not accurately interpret RFC821. |
Keyword(in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Keyword(in English) | SMTP / DNS |
Paper # | IA2014-31 |
Date of Issue |
Conference Information | |
Committee | IA |
---|---|
Conference Date | 2014/9/30(1days) |
Place (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Place (in English) | |
Topics (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Topics (in English) | |
Chair | |
Vice Chair | |
Secretary | |
Assistant |
Paper Information | |
Registration To | Internet Architecture(IA) |
---|---|
Language | JPN |
Title (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Sub Title (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Title (in English) | A Confusion on Correct Interpretation of RFC821 (SMTP) about Domain Names |
Sub Title (in English) | |
Keyword(1) | SMTP |
Keyword(2) | DNS |
1st Author's Name | Masataka OHTA |
1st Author's Affiliation | Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology() |
Date | 2014-10-07 |
Paper # | IA2014-31 |
Volume (vol) | vol.114 |
Number (no) | 236 |
Page | pp.pp.- |
#Pages | 3 |
Date of Issue |