Presentation 2012-10-27
Relation of Annotation Strategies for the Usefulness of a Provided Handout
Mao ADACHI, Minoru NAKAYAMA, Yoshiaki KAJII,
PDF Download Page PDF download Page Link
Abstract(in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Abstract(in English) This paper discuss about handouts from two aspects. They are questionnaire forms and comments of free description for handout. Questionnaire forms survey evaluating usefulness of handout picked out four factors which was "cohesive" and " brevity" for subjective evaluation, and "understandability" and "interrelating" for content assessment. All handouts were classified into three groups using four factor scores. Their groups were named usefulness-low, usefulness-middle, usefulness-high. So, relations of annotations and comments for three groups were analyzed using corresponding analysis. As a result, it became obvious that comments and annotations changed for the usefulness of handout.
Keyword(in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Keyword(in English) handout / annotation strategies / content assessment / University education / correspondence analysis
Paper # ET2012-39
Date of Issue

Conference Information
Committee ET
Conference Date 2012/10/20(1days)
Place (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Place (in English)
Topics (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Topics (in English)
Chair
Vice Chair
Secretary
Assistant

Paper Information
Registration To Educational Technology (ET)
Language JPN
Title (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Sub Title (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Title (in English) Relation of Annotation Strategies for the Usefulness of a Provided Handout
Sub Title (in English)
Keyword(1) handout
Keyword(2) annotation strategies
Keyword(3) content assessment
Keyword(4) University education
Keyword(5) correspondence analysis
1st Author's Name Mao ADACHI
1st Author's Affiliation Tokyo Institute of Technology()
2nd Author's Name Minoru NAKAYAMA
2nd Author's Affiliation Tokyo Institute of Technology
3rd Author's Name Yoshiaki KAJII
3rd Author's Affiliation Tokyo Gakugei University
Date 2012-10-27
Paper # ET2012-39
Volume (vol) vol.112
Number (no) 269
Page pp.pp.-
#Pages 6
Date of Issue