Presentation 2004-10-15
Performance Comparison of Intserv-Based and Diffserv-Based Networks Does really Intserv provide better delay performance than Diffserv?
Shigeo SHIODA,
PDF Download Page PDF download Page Link
Abstract(in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Abstract(in English) It is generally believed that Intserv model is more suitable for strict QoS guarantees than Diffserv model because the former has per-flow-base traffic handling mechanisms but the latter does not. This general belief, however, has not been fully verified yet. In this paper, we theoretically and numerically compare Intserv and Diffserv models in terms of jc-percentile end-to-end queueing delay as well as the maximum end-to-end queueing delay. We find that, in some network topology, Diffserv architecture makes the maximum queueing delay smaller than Intserv architecture. We also find that in most cases Diffserv makes x-percentile queueing delay much smaller than that in Intserv-based networks.
Keyword(in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Keyword(in English) Intserv / Diffserv / queueing delay / queueing network / QoS
Paper # IN2004-86
Date of Issue

Conference Information
Committee IN
Conference Date 2004/10/8(1days)
Place (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Place (in English)
Topics (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Topics (in English)
Chair
Vice Chair
Secretary
Assistant

Paper Information
Registration To Information Networks (IN)
Language JPN
Title (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Sub Title (in Japanese) (See Japanese page)
Title (in English) Performance Comparison of Intserv-Based and Diffserv-Based Networks Does really Intserv provide better delay performance than Diffserv?
Sub Title (in English)
Keyword(1) Intserv
Keyword(2) Diffserv
Keyword(3) queueing delay
Keyword(4) queueing network
Keyword(5) QoS
1st Author's Name Shigeo SHIODA
1st Author's Affiliation Urban Environment and Systems, Chiba University()
Date 2004-10-15
Paper # IN2004-86
Volume (vol) vol.104
Number (no) 340
Page pp.pp.-
#Pages 6
Date of Issue