Presentation | 2017-07-22 Effects of language production on prediction: Word vs. picture visual world study. Aine Ito, Max S. Dunn iii, Martin J. Pickering, |
---|---|
PDF Download Page | PDF download Page Link |
Abstract(in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Abstract(in English) | Under production-based models of language prediction, people use their production system for prediction, and an enhanced use of the production system will facilitate prediction. We tested this hypothesis by comparing people?s predictive eye movements when they did or did not shadow sentences. The models predict shadowing should facilitate prediction but interfere with integration, because prediction and production are assumed to share mechanisms while integration and production are not. Native British English speakers listened to sentences containing a highly predictable word, while viewing words or objects representing the predictable target (bee), its phonological competitor (bean), or an unrelated distractor (cat). We presented words in the first experiment, and objects in the second experiment. One half of the experiment involved the shadow task. Predictive eye movements to the target occurred earlier in the shadow task than in the listen task in the first experiment, while this time-course was similar in both tasks in the second experiment. Predictive eye movements to the competitor occurred earlier in the shadow task than in the listen task in the second experiment, while the competitor effect did not occur in either task in the first experiment. Earlier predictive eye movements in the shadow vs. listen task support prediction by production. Thus, production can facilitate prediction, but it may be affected by the type of context in which comprehension takes place. |
Keyword(in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Keyword(in English) | Prediction / Production / Shadowing / Eye-tracking / Visual world paradigm |
Paper # | TL2017-19 |
Date of Issue | 2017-07-15 (TL) |
Conference Information | |
Committee | TL |
---|---|
Conference Date | 2017/7/22(2days) |
Place (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Place (in English) | NINJAL |
Topics (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Topics (in English) | Human Language Processing and Learning |
Chair | Masami Suzuki(KDDI Research) |
Vice Chair | Tadahisa Kondo(Kogakuin Univ.) / Chiaki Kubomura(Yamano College of Aesthetics) |
Secretary | Tadahisa Kondo(Kobe Gakuin Univ.) / Chiaki Kubomura(Kyoto Univ.) |
Assistant | Nobuyuki Jincho(Waseda Univ.) / Noriaki Takada(Ferris Univ.) |
Paper Information | |
Registration To | Technical Committee on Thought and Language |
---|---|
Language | ENG |
Title (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Sub Title (in Japanese) | (See Japanese page) |
Title (in English) | Effects of language production on prediction: Word vs. picture visual world study. |
Sub Title (in English) | |
Keyword(1) | Prediction |
Keyword(2) | Production |
Keyword(3) | Shadowing |
Keyword(4) | Eye-tracking |
Keyword(5) | Visual world paradigm |
1st Author's Name | Aine Ito |
1st Author's Affiliation | University of Oxford(Univ. of Oxford) |
2nd Author's Name | Max S. Dunn iii |
2nd Author's Affiliation | University of Edinburgh(Univ. of Edinburgh) |
3rd Author's Name | Martin J. Pickering |
3rd Author's Affiliation | University of Edinburgh(Univ. of Edinburgh) |
Date | 2017-07-22 |
Paper # | TL2017-19 |
Volume (vol) | vol.117 |
Number (no) | TL-149 |
Page | pp.pp.31-36(TL), |
#Pages | 6 |
Date of Issue | 2017-07-15 (TL) |